Critical Perspectives on The Hunger Games

February 8th, 2015

Suzanne Collins author of The Hunger Games has a similar style to Shirley Jackson, author of The Lottery.  In both stories the government requires all the residents in the villages or Districts to gather and have one or two people to be sacrificed in order to maintain piece in the nation. Both stories fail to explain specifically how and why they have these events happen. The citizen’s don’t see the ethics in the situation either, but they are forced to obey this unethical law because an uprising could mean disaster. It’s scary to think that these are possible government systems that could be in effect in the future and the residents then wouldn’t give it a second thought.

It’s sickening how the people in the Capitol find teenagers killing each other as entertainment and to be completely normal. Katniss’s prep team are good examples of characters who saw entertainment in death.  “It’s funny, because even though they’re rattling on about the Games, it’s all about where they were or what they were doing or how they felt when a specific event occurred” (353-354). Katniss along with all the rest of the Districts see how unethical the Games are. Even people in the Capitol see that there are no real ethics in the Games and are even brave enough to show the Capitol that they are willing to fight against their own home. Like when the red-headed girl was trying to run away but ended up becoming an Avox. Cinna also keeps bringing back the mockingjay pin for a lot of Katniss’s outfits because he can see how it is a symbol for the Districts. In the other books the mockingjay becomes a symbol of rebellion.

Even in this world it seems like we are becoming immune to death and violence.


Trackback URI | Comments are closed.

  • About

    This is an area on your website where you can add text. This will serve as an informative location on your website, where you can talk about your site.

  • Blogroll
  • Admin