COMM 208: Science Scavenger Hunt

Noah Aniser

New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/style/the-murder-hornet-hunters-of-paris.html

The Queen Is Dead.

The Bize brothers also known as the “murder hornet hunters” killed another nest at a preschool in suburban Paris.  

Asian hornets first appeared in southwest France in 2004 and traveled all the way to the capital of France. By now the little insects became a serious threat to institutions like preschools or public buildings. That made the firefighter department punt the wasp problem to private pest technicians. A new side business was established and the Bize brothers took over.

They killed an estimate number of 300 Asian hornet nests in 2019 and the numbers are increasing. 

The enormous number of Asian hornets are endangering the honeybees because they both compete for flower resources in the city which makes their work so important.

Honeybees have a long and rich history in France which is one of Europe’s major honey trade hubs. The little insects are not only honey makers though, they also play a really important role for our ecosystem. 

A decreasing number of honey bees would not just threaten France’s honey business but also their ecosystem. 

News Comment #10

Noah Aniser

New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/26/business/energy-environment/coronavirus-renewable-energy-wind.html?action=click&module=News&pgtype=Homepage

How The Virus Slowed the Booming wind Energy Business?

The article is about the enormous impact of the pandemic and how the corona virus slowed down the booming wind energy business. The author starts the article with an example of a company where corona delayed the work on a big project. EDf Renewables is a company that focuses on renewable energies like wind turbines. They had a really big project in Nebraska which was supposed to be done before the end of the year. They were totally on track until the company experienced a big blow. 

A manager who was building the giant cylinders on which the turbines sit had died of the coronavirus. That tragic event slowed down the project drastically.

After mentioning that example, the author talks more in depth about other reasons that are responsible for the slow down. The pandemic has disrupted global supply chains and imperiled millions of jobs. The author mentions a research of the The American Wind Energy Association which estimates that the pandemic could threaten a total of $35 billion in investment and 35000 jobs this year. 

After talking about all the negative impacts, the author describes the reasons for the boom and emphasizes that through numbers. 

Overall the article is pretty good if you are interested in topics related to renewable energy. It is well written and informative. The main information can be read in the first few sentences. The background information and the numbers are pushed towards the middle and the end of the article which is good. 

The headline is alright because it raises a question which the reader wants an answer to. 

I think it’s a newsworthy story and topic because it is about the impact of the virus on renewable energy. Renewable energy sources are our future and therefore the article definitely matters to us. 

Media Comparison:

Noah Aniser

“Tagesschau”

Audio: https://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/audio/audio-97401.html

Text: https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/nigeria-proteste-101.html

The story is about the lethal protests in Nigeria. Since a few weeks, people in Nigeria are going into the streets to fight for new reforms regarding unemployment, income and police brutality. 

Both articles use pretty much the same phrases. It’s almost word for word but even though they use pretty much the same words, they still differ in several aspects. 

First of all, they use a different headline. For the written article it is,” Several Deaths after Protests in Nigeria” and for the audio it is “Nigeria: Deaths after Protests Criticizing the Government”

They basically say the same thing, but they are still different. At least the sentence structure. Another difference is the header. The text version of the story has a header before the header. It seems like a subtitle which already includes the most important information of the article. After reading the subtitle, I already know the most important news and don’t have to read until the end of the story. The audio version starts with a header but has no such thing as a subtitle. 

The last major difference is, that the written version of the story uses a new title in the middle of the article. By reading the article while listening to it simultaneously, showed me that written article uses another title to give the reader a new reason to continue with the story. It almost seems like it is divided into two articles.

News Comment #9

Noah Aniser

New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/16/sports/lauren-fleshmans-feminist-approach-to-coaching.html?action=click&module=Features&pgtype=Homepage

Lauren Fleshman’s Feminist Approach to Coaching

The article is about the former elite runner Lauren Fleshman and her approach on changing the way elite women view running. She wants to achieve that female runners see beyond their speed and looks because these attributes can cause serious dangers. The “win-at-all-cost” culture has harmed so many athletes including her which is why she wants to prevent others from suffering the same fate.

After the author gives the main information, she mentions the really successful career of Lauren Fleshman and how that impacted her women-centered coaching approach. Even though the career sounds really impressive, Fleshman thinks that she never reached her full potential as an athlete and that, simply because she focused too much on her body size. 

By comparing herself to the top athletes, she figured how much weight she has to lose. Through hard workouts and a good diet, she achieved her goal of losing weight and becoming faster. Now she realizes that it was the wrong approach. Health problems and other issues like stress followed and made her miss several opportunities like the Olympic games in 2008 and 2012.

Female athletes need a different approach of coaching says Fleshman. They need an environment that honors their physiology and counters the reality of sexism. 

Afterwards the author keeps talking more in depth about the measurements for the group of athletes and what their results mean. She ends the article by giving even more background information on female athletes and examples where they got treated wrong. 

The article is definitely worth reading because it talks about a topic that I actually never thought about. I’m an athlete and therefore I know how dangerous pressure is and how drastically it can affect your health.

The structure of the article is good because the main information comes right after the little introduction in the beginning and the background information is placed towards the end. I think that the article is newsworthy because the majority of the population did some kind of competitive sport in their life and therefore know how dangers the “win-at-all-cost” culture actually is. Competing with pain is just one example. 

The headline is in my eyes not the best because the use of the term “Feminist” might cause some people especially men, not to read the article.Overall, it’s an interesting article about a topic that deserves more attention.

COMM 208 – Descriptive Writing

“Change your point of view”

Noah Aniser

I’m a soccer player here at Morningside and I usually have practice every day at 8:00pm. For this assignment, I chose to visit Olsen Stadium in the afternoon. I left my house at around 3:15pm and arrived at the stadium at approximately 3:30, right when football practice was about to start. I knew that football practice is at that time but what I didn’t know, was that Track and Field has practice simultaneously. So, the field was really crowded and loud. Similar to a game day but without the fans. I had the stands for myself and so I chose a spot and made myself comfortable. I tried to watch both practices carefully and maybe eyedrop one or two conversations between athletes and coaches. Unfortunately, I was to far away from the field to actually here a one on one conversation but crossing the track during their practice was not a good idea would probably have ended lethal. The only thing that I could constantly hear were the coaches yelling at their players and the uncomfortable sound of two helmets hitting each other. Occasionally I was able to see some facial expressions of either the football players when they took of their helmets or of the track team after they finished their run. The facial expressions varied from disappointment over a missed opportunity to happiness after a successful execution. It was interesting to see how much you could tell by looking into their sweaty faces without even knowing what exactly happened. 

The stadium at that time was way louder, mainly because of the higher number of sweating athletes but also because of the music that the football team played while practicing. 

Olsen stadium is usually not nearly as packed when I have practice. We go on the field right after women’s practice gets done. After us the lights turn off and Olsen goes to sleep. 

Seeing the same stadium at a different time made me realize how important the role of the perspective is. The stadium has a completely different atmosphere depending on where you are located and what time of the day it is. 

News Comment #8

New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/13/opinion/vietnam-economy.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

Noah Aniser

Is Vietnam the Next ‘Asian Miracle’?

The article is about the country which is currently the world’s fastest growing economy. Vietnam stopped the spread of the Corona Virus quite fast which has kept their death rate among the four lowest in the whole world. Contact tracing and rapid isolation measures allowed Vietnam to open businesses really quickly. While other countries face problems and suffer enormous economic contractions, Vietnam is growing. 

After he explains the reason for their growth and the low death rate, the author talks more about the history of the term ‘Asian Miracle’. It basically refers to Asian countries who grew their way out of poverty like Japan, China or South Korea. 

The miracle didn’t just happen, it already has been in the making for several years. The author analyses the reasons responsible for the growth but also mentions possible threats which could bring an end to the miracle. 

Potential obstacles are shrinking populations, declining trade and their autocratic government which already rules for multiple years now. They are just assumptions though. It could also be that their economy keeps growing, simple by moving workers from rural areas to urban factory jobs. 

The article is really interesting especially because the enormous growth of their economy happened during times of Covid-19. The quick reactions and measurements to stop the virus from spreading showed how strong other countries underestimated the impact of the virus on the economy. 

The set-up of the article is really nice because it has the most important information in the upper part and all the background information which is interesting but not necessary more in the middle and the end. 

The headline is well chosen because the reader wants to get wants to get an answer to the question and because most of the people are probably not familiar what the term ‘Asian Miracle’ means. 

The topic is definitely newsworthy because every country is currently facing a massive change in their economy. 

Story 2: Final Draft

Pandemic Increased Wealth Inequality Even Further.

The wealth of 467 billionaires increased by $731 billion only during the time of the pandemic. 

According to the Guardian Newspaper, London, “The top 0,0001% are using a global pandemic as an opportunity to make outrageous profits after receiving a de facto bailout by the federal reserve.” President Trump’s tax cut to the wealthy, makes billionaires now pay a lower effective tax rate than teachers, nurses or firefighters. 

Their purchasing and investment power in addition to government resources help them make enormous profits from and during economic catastrophes like Covid-19. Nevertheless, billionaires are very important during economic catastrophes because they create millions of jobs and benefit the economy through their companies. The public opinion on billionaires is usually more negative because the majority thinks that no one deserves to have that much money. Even billionaire Mark Zuckerberg’s quote mentioned in the New York Times said that” on some level no one deserves to have that much money.”  

They have everything but how does it come that billionaires still increase their wealth further? According to the New York Times, “studies over the years have indicated that the rich, unlike the leisured gentry of old, tend to work longer hours and spend less time socializing.” Of course, that still doesn’t justify the enormous amount of money, but it shows that there is a lot of hard work and effort behind it. Others increase their wealth by using more unethical methods.

Jeff Bezos, who is currently the wealthiest person alive, made approximately $13 billion in one day, while his companies denied paid sick leave and a safe workplace to thousands of his workers. Another example is the Walton family which generated around $21 billion during the last weeks. The largest private employer in the U.S. still makes their employees work for starvation wages at Walmart.

The Business Insider even used a study from 2012 which shows, “that as much as $32 trillion was being held offshore by the world’s wealthiest people.”

Tax laws and loopholes keep billionaires at the top, while 92 million Americans are uninsured, tens of millions are facing evictions and according the too Business Insider, “more than 40 million Americans unemployed. Tobias Sadler who is a business management major at Morningside said that “it is scary to see how fast people can lose their job and that the job market seems to get worse and worse.”

The Business Insider also said that “in 2019, four out of ten Americans didn’t have enough cash in their bank to cover over a $400 unexpected expense.” Kai Schwägerl said, “that it seems very unfair that some people increase their wealth by so much while the majority of the U.S. works extremely hard to barely linger their basic needs.” The student from Germany who studies accounting at Morningside also thinks that “the government has to increase their efforts to stop the increasing wealth inequality between the really rich and the working class.”

The numbers above show how big the wealth inequality actually is and that study was even before the pandemic happened. 

Congress needs to stand up for the Americans that are not in the top 0,0001% and change national priorities. A good start would be to use the enormous amount of money and wealth gain made through the pandemic by the billionaires. Using that money would guarantee healthcare for the duration of the pandemic. 

According to Americans for tax fairness from the Guardian,” imposing a 60% tax on the wealth gains made by just 467 billionaires would raise over $440 billion.” Jackson Presha who is a history major at Morningside said that “imposing a 60% tax on the wealth makes sense and should definitely be established but there should also be a possibility for billionaires who donate a certain amount money to charity events and good cause to avoid the 60% tax.”

With the money made through the tax, healthcare could be extended to everyone in America, regardless of their coverage. It also means that no one would have to pay medical bills out of their pocket for the next 12 months. 

Bernd Haberkorn who is a former German sociology professor said that “freeing people from paying medical bills during times of corona would have several positive effects. The strongest advantage would be, that the level of pressure on families with financial issues decreases significantly.  That will lead to an increase of their overall mental health and their well-being.”

Sources: 

News Comment #7

Noah Aniser

New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/07/opinion/trump-electoral-college-abolish.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

How Trump Could Win Again, Even if He Loses

The article is about the Electoral College and if it is a fair democratic system. The electoral College is the 230-year-old election system which allows a presidential candidate to win an election with less votes than his opponent. Donald trump’s 2016 victory is only one out of five examples but the second one in the last twenty years. The author raises the question if the election system is even fair and more importantly democratic. 

His answer is no because it wasn’t designed by brilliant men, yet the U.S. stick to it for centuries even though it just isn’t fair. It doesn’t matter if you are a republican or a democrat, because it is about the worth of your vote as a citizen. A democratic country is a country where the citizens decide who the leaders are and here that’s only partly true. By voting, you express your opinion about who should rule and lead this country but through the electoral college system your vote doesn’t count the way it should. 

The author itself is very enthusiastic about that matter. He even wrote a book called ‘Let the People Pick The President: the Case for Abolishing the Electoral College.” The article basically summarizes the idea behind the book. Your vote should count the way it is supposed to count. 

I think that article could include more information about the election system as a whole and how it works but other than that, it is a really short and good article. It covers a topic that matters to everyone in the U.S. and that makes it news. The majority of the Americans experienced at the last election how it feels to lose even though you have more votes. To me, there is a need for change. 

The headline sounds really interesting because there are several ways of how it could be interpreted. So, the headline really makes me want to read the article. Overall, I think it is a really good article that expresses the content in just a few words.  

So, it’s definitely worth reading it. 

The Price We Pay For The Luxuries Of The Few

We are endangering our planet just to serve a very small number of people. Their luxuries life got us into a mess and has the potential to fully destroy our environment. Greta Thunberg said at a climate conference in Poland that “Our biosphere is being sacrificed so that rich people in countries like mine can live in luxury.”

The 15 year old climate activist from Sweden wants change. The change is necessary and it’s still not too late. We are in a crisis and it’s finally the time to admit that, because you cannot solve a problem without treating it like one. She blames our parents and grandparents for putting such a burden on us.

The leaders will not change our situation, we are. They are not admitting what they did but that doesn’t matter. We gain nothing from blaming people who seem to not even care. She explains, that “we have not come here to beg world leaders to care. You have ignored us in the past and you will ignore us again.”

By taking actions, change will happen. The hope is there, but we have to use it. United, we are strong enough to make the necessary change because “the real power belongs to the people” she says.

Story 2: Rough Draft

Pandemic Increased Wealth Inequality Even Further.

$731,000,000,000. That’s the amount of money by how much the wealth of 467 billionaires increased through the pandemic. 

According to the guardian, “The top 0,0001% are using a global pandemic as an opportunity to make outrageous profits after receiving a de facto bailout by the federal reserve.” President Trump’s tax giveaway to the wealthy, makes billionaires now pay a lower effective tax rate than teachers, nurses or firefighters. 

During the pandemic, billionaires have made an extraordinary wealth gain. Their purchasing and investment power in addition to government resources help them make enormous profits from and during economic catastrophes like Covid-19. 

Jeff Bezos, who is currently the wealthiest person alive, made approximately $13,000,000,000 in one day, while his companies denied paid sick leave and a safe workplace to thousands of his workers. Another example is the Walton family which generated around $21,000,000,000 during the last weeks. The largest private employer in the U.S. still makes their employees work for starvation wages at Walmart.

The Business Insider even used a study from 2012 which shows, “that as much as $32 trillion was being held offshore by the world’s wealthiest people.”

Tax laws and loopholes keep billionaires at the top, while 92 million Americans are uninsured, tens of millions are facing evictions and according the too Business Insider, “more than 40 million Americans unemployed. 

They also said that “in 2019, four out of ten Americans didn’t have enough cash in their bank to cover over a $400 unexpected expense.” 

That shows how big the wealth inequality actually is and that study was even before the pandemic happened. 

Congress needs to stand up for the Americans that are not in the top 0,0001% and change national priorities. A good start would be to use the enormous amount of money and wealth gain made through the pandemic by the billionaires. Using that money would guarantee healthcare for the duration of the pandemic.  

According to Americans for tax fairness from the Guardian,” imposing a 60% tax on the wealth gains made by just 467 billionaires would raise over $440 billion.” With that money, healthcare could be extended to everyone in America, regardless of their coverage. It also means that no one would have to pay medical bills out of their pocket for the next 12 months. 

Sources: