The begginin short story was about a husband, who’s wife was dieing and a inventor who would not sell the money for a cheaper price in order for him to make money. The husband breaks into the inventors store and steals the medicine. The question is should the husband have stolen. I think that if the inventor was smarter he would have sold it for the price and just get paid back over time.Then he would not have had it stolen and would have gotten better publicity. I think that stealing was the husbands only option.
The article talked about how women and men are different in how they view morality and how they solve problems. It talked about how the different sexes mature differently, women more quickly. It showed some of the results of a twenty year experiment on the different sexes and how there views have changed over the years.
I think that different people, especially different sexes, mature at different rates. I think its not just limited to female vs. male. It also should take into consideration living conditions and other factors. I know that not just your sex constitutes how your maturity has grown. I don’t know what the man should have done. I know that if i was in the situation i would have stolen it or done other things in order to get the medicine. There are other methods of getting the medicine it really depends on how much longer the wife will last. I know that all my male counterparts would think of it in a l=multitude of different ways as i have. That is why I think that its not just what sex you are its also other elements.