College Quarantine Breakdowns Leave Some at Risk by Natasha Singer (The New York Times)
The article is mainly about students opinions on how colleges and universities try to get Covid-19 under control on campus. Several students from various universities, like UNC, Notre Dame, etc, have been interviewed. The general opinion seems to be that students who get tested positive get quarantined or isolated quickly but the conditions in those isolation and quarantine areas are bad. Students in quarantine who don’t know if they have the virus get roomed together with students who got positive test results. Those students get unnecessary exposure to the virus even though they might not have it themselves. Many universities don’t have any staff in those areas. The food is bad and conditions in general are bad. A lot of quarantined students also use the same laundry rooms that all the other students use. There was one example given of a plan that appears to work pretty well: Tufts University near Boston has significantly reduced dorm occupancy and is testing all students for the virus twice a week. It has also installed modular residential units on tennis courts and a parking lot for up to 225 students with infections, rather than house them in a dorm. That way, the lack of elevators in resident halls is not going to be a problem and in emergency situations, the patients room is easily accessible. On top of that everyone gets tested twice a week. In short, universities are doing a good job for people who want to take initiative and don’t want to spread the virus, but they are letting too much stuff fly under the radar and they don’t consider the mental health of affected students.
The article’s lead basically mentions the most important information. But I feel like the article repeats itself several times. In my opinion, there were too many too similar examples. The article could have been a little shorter if the journalist would have summarized some similar examples or used one example as the main example and then only added parts from other examples that differ from the main example. If I would have written the article, I might have put the student’s quote in the end (“They are doing a good job for people who want to take initiative and don’t want to spread the virus,” Mr. Hennen said. “But I think they are letting too much stuff fly under the radar.”) and another quote from a different student (“One thing that needs to be taken care of more is the mental health aspect of it all because it is very, very scary having coronavirus,” Ms. Terry said of her isolation experience. “We’re college students. We just moved away from our homes and it’s very stressful.”) closer to the top, because I like to write articles using the inverted pyramid and those quotes summarize students’ opinion very well.