Video Game Article

For this post for CEC, we were asked to find an article, read it, and then blog about it.

This article was done by the Economist magazine.  There wasn’t an author stated for this article.  The title was “All the world’s a game”.  The main idea was simply to inform the public that videogames are on the rise and to just give out some background info.  For instance, Japan likes different games than America.  China is the second biggest market when it used to be Japan.  Of course, USA is the biggest market.  Multiple records have been set with videogames.  MW3 sold 750 million dollars in just five days (I picked up two copies – one for me and my brother. AWESOME GAME!!)  Really, this article was simply explaining some important info. that videogames are on the rise.  However, I was just using this article as some basic background info.  It would help if I haven’t lost the instructions for the paper!!

I must say, it was interesting seeing those stats and info.  Yet, I was not surprised.  I remember when it was just a small business.  Hardly anybody thought it was worth the time.  Well, my parents did.  They read in between the lines and saw what videogames could do for and my brother and me.  Especially for me, with my language difficulties.   Now, it is a worldwide business.  There are magazines, articles, websites, pop, food.  You name it, there is something based on or related to videogames.  Again, I was not surprised.  However, I was surprised that more and more “normal” people are playing it.  Even old people are starting to play it!!  Now, that is a sign that videogames are quickly becoming one of the biggest entertainment industries in the world.  Perhaps the best.  The technology is starting to get to the point that anybody can play and is easy to play.  It used to be that only the hardcore and quick-learners could play.  Now, it is the exact opposite.

Basically, this article was really quite interesting.  Some great background info.

Posted in CEC: Videogames | 27 Comments

Negative or Positive View of Gaming

Do people have a negative view of gaming? Interview your roommates or conduct a survey to find out.  Tell us what you learn?

I decided to do a large number of interviews  I decided on my parents and coworkers.  (Around 10.  I was bored.)

My parents have a positive view on gaming.  They were able to see how video games were able to teach my brother and me in ways they could not.  My mom and dad were there every step of the way.  And they admit, video games truly do help.  My language skills have improved just by simply reading the subtitles (Being hearing impaired from birth screws up your social skills and language skills and grammar almost immediately.  Thus, important to develop.).  My brother was able to think in creative ways to solve a problem.  The list goes on and on in a variety of ways.  So, they have no qualms with videogames.  Except when my work suffers cause of videogames…  Then, they have a bone to pick with me.  Hehe.  Anyway, even though my parents support videogames, it doesn’t mean they are able to play them.  My dad is normally too tired from work.  The best he can do is play Wii.  Simple stuff.  Not “do ultra-fast series of buttons in half-second”.  His fingers aren’t the way they used to be.  My mother is almost the same way.  Except she doesn’t have the fingers problem.  Otherwise, she is the same way as my father.

My coworkers are, for the most part, gamers.  By the way, I work at Fareway Meat Department in Sergeant Bluff.  The part-timers there are for the most part around college age or just graduated from college.  Thus, they play videogames.  It is easy to figure out their opinions.  The full-timers and managers don’t have the time to do such things.  They have families and whatnot to deal with.  Thus, they pretty much have no time for such things.  They agree it’s fun.  But, they don’t worry about it.  They have other things to be more concerned about.

All of the people I interviewed were really quite young.  So, they obviously would agree more so than, say, an elderly person of the age 70.  So, the survey is proof that McGonigal is correct.  The younger you are, the more likely you are likely to accept videogames.

Posted in CEC: Videogames | 27 Comments

What is a game and why is it fun?

According to Jane McGonical, what is a game and why are games fun?  Are her ideas different from what you thought of on your own in our class discussion?

According to her, a game is something that makes you do unnecessary work or go though needless obstacles.  In other words, the fun version of hard work.  Videogames are considered on par with sports.  They one and the same.  Thus, they are fun.  At least that is the short and brief version of what Jane mentioned in her book.

I believe she has a point.  However, there are many different ways to interpret videogames.  There might be a majority.  There might not be one.  There could be an opinion that everybody agrees on.  Or it is like politics where nobody agrees at all.  Or they do and they develop rivalries and friendships just to spite them…  Oh wait.  We alrready do that in multiplayer.  Nevermind.  Back to the point, her definition of what makes a game a game seems right on target.

Truthfully, I believe that there is an understanding as to why games are fun.  It is because they challenge us in different ways and make the time fly by. That, I believe, everybody would agree upon.  At least with the people I have met in my lifetime.  Anyway, I had trouble believing that games are considered hard work.  After thinking on it for a couple of days, I must admit Jane has a point.  I have noticed that I don’t do mundane things like watch T.V. (except for occasional shows that provoke the mind in different ways or quite interesting) or surf the internet (my time is too valuable).  I have noticed I seem unbearably bored at certain times because the task is so easy or repetitive.  All of this supports her argument.  Thus, I agree with Jane wholeheartedly on her points of what makes a game a game and what makes them so fun.

Posted in CEC: Videogames | 31 Comments

Immigration

Personally, I don’t think the drivers’ licenses truly needed to be checked.  What if you happened to forget your license?  So, that kind of argument I would agree with.  I can’t remember who said it.  Anyway, I could see how the law is not one of the most well thought laws.  Everybody in honors raised valid concerns and questions. The only thing we didn’t really cover was why is there an effective way to stop illegal immigration without violence or drastic measures?

I believe that we know how to agree or disagree politely.

Posted in Honors | 24 Comments

Chaz

For this discussion, we had to watch a couple of youtube videos.  One was for his (or her?) dance in Dancing With the Stars tv series.  Another one was a story done on Dateline.

I really do not see the purpose of gender transformation.  I mean, really?  Imagine me trying to turn into a woman.  A big, husky, dude undergoing a change to become a woman by having my ding-a-ling cut off and then turn that into a hole.  ….  NNNOOOOOO!!!!!   TOO PAINFUL!!! NOT WORTH IT!!!  But then I think about vice versa.  A woman turning into a man.  Uh, how do they get the essential man part?  Or does the person not get that?  So, the person becomes an it?  Hey, Chaz is an it!! Haha!!

Honestly, it is not worth doing the gender transformation.  It is pointless, I believe.  There are pros and cons in being a man or woman. A lot of people might say being a dude has more benefits.  But a woman can command a dude’s attention by dressing like a slut and enticing him.  And a woman is naturally smarter than men.  However, there is more pressure in being a woman.  I mean, a man can be somewhat fat so long as he isn’t too fat or at least has some muscles to boast about.  Meanwhile, a woman must have plentiful amount of curves and basically be perfect and sexy hot.  The list can go on and on.  It all comes down to this:  it depends on the person’s perspective.  So, what was Chaz thinking about at that time then?

Posted in Honors | 26 Comments

Elvis

I must admit I was not expecting to be talking about Elvis Presley in  Intro. to Religion.  It was a nice change of pace.  Especially because my mom really likes his music.  She even has some of his movies.  So, she talked about him often.  Did I pay attention when she talked about him occasionally?  Nope.  I didn’t really care.  However, after mentioning that we talked about him to my mother yesterday, she was REALLY SURPRISED.  Then she went back to doing whatever she was doing.  I think her Elvis fandom wore off…  Finally.  It was getting old.

Ii is not surprising that Elvis fandom is as big as it is.  That some might consider it as a religion.  Well, it has most of the elements of religion.  But I don’t believe that is hsould be considered a religion… yet.  2000 years from now, it might be.  Scary thought.  But, think about when Christianity came about.  I’m pretty sure everybody thought Christianity was ridiculous.  Look where it is now…

Posted in Intro to religion | 21 Comments

Presentation

It is nice to know what the professor expects out of you for a presentation.  All the other years they were either too detailed or too blah in general.  This time it’s like we are taking control of our projects rather than having to meet a certain criteria.  We have all shown that capability time and time again.  Now, we know what is expected of us indefinitely.  Because of that, we can now FINALLY be creative and go above and beyond the call of duty if we want to.  Or we can just have a decent presentation that gets a good grade like an  A.  It won’t be anything special but it will meet the criteria.  Hopefully, everybody will at least offer some kind of variety.  Like Prof. de Vega said, it would get boring quickly unless each person does something considerably different.  I’m guessing that it will be fun having these presentations and ending the semester with these.  But, then there’s the finals right after the presentations…

Posted in Intro to religion | 31 Comments

Gladwell

Malcolm Gladwell wrote an article on how football and dogfighting are not at all that different.  Basically, the end results are the same.  Either you are a victor but with serious health issues or you are simply dead.

I will be doing the rhetorical triangle.  The audience would  be just about anybody.  The audience is simply the people being talked to.  That can be anybody whether they are simply curious or actually has been a part in football or dogfighting or both in the case of Vick.  Basically, anybody that is curious or has been in these kind of situations.  But there wouldn’t be an audience if the speaker or writer didn’t have some kind of experience in one or both of these fields.  The speaker is a veteran in the football sport.  He has played for a considerable amount of years, thus, he knows what he is talking about.  Because of that, he has influence the audience that he is not an idiot to be blunt.  But all of this would pointless without having a purpose in mind.  The purpose the writer was trying to convey is this:  Is football really any different from dogfighting?  It probably isn’t yet it is.  Anybody could go one way or another.  With dogfighting the dogs don’t have a choice.  Meanwhile in football they do.  Otherwise, that is the only difference.  But, the author believes it is one and the same.  He only put out both sides of the argument or persuasion just to back his idea.  And he certainly did.  As for my opinion, I can see what Gladwell is getting at.  Yet, the football players weren’t forced to play football.  In conclusion, I can go either way.  It just depends on the situation.

Posted in Passport | 27 Comments

BDUBS

If I could actually hear, I would tell you what we talked about at BDUBS.  Instead, I could hear the music more so than the conversation.  The food was delicious.  Not ordering mild flavor and hot flavor combined again.  The mild was actually spicier than the hot.  So I could not fell my mouth or lips for an hour or so.  Still tasty, however.  Just need something much more mild than the mild.  Otherwise, I basically twiddled my thumbs.

Posted in Honors | 25 Comments

Sexism

The article we had to read for honors was basically about sexism in general.  It had two examples.  Sarah Palin and Hilary Clinton were those two.  They talked about how sexism played a major in their runs for president for each woman.  It talked about both little and big details.

I believe sexism is mainly a subsection of racism.  Then racism to prejudice.  And prejudice is never good.  It literally limits each person’s capabilities.  A woman might not get the job she wants because she happens to be a woman.  A BLACK WOMAN would probably never get anywhere because she is black and a woman.  That combines two big issues in this country:  racism and sexism.  If ever there was a double-whammy…  Anyway,  I believe that any form of prejudice is a waste of time.  We should all be more worried about doing a good job rather than looks or races or gender.  Complete waste of time.  But, it looks like it will quite a few years before that complete equality will come about.

Posted in Honors | 29 Comments