I looked over the category of women on the PR News site. There was most definitely a theme of articles surrounding the topics of health, wellness and new products to enrich a woman’s life. The article titled “Regular Screening Mammograms Significantly Reduce Breast Cancer Deaths,” I chose to read for a more in depth analysis. Right off the bat I can see that the paragraphes are very short. Some of the blocks only being a few sentences and some sections only being one long sentence. My articles have average to somewhat long sentences and so did this article. However my paragraphs were not as short as theirs. The first sentence of the article is basically the same as the title which is the lead. My title was never the same as my lead I think this is another place were our writings differ. Our writing is alike in the aspect of using the upside down pyramid, stating the most important facts first. When their article gives attribution the title of the source person is very long, stating who they are, what they do, and where they are from. I did not do this when including attribution in my articles. There was a lot of scientific explanation and statistics included. I hardly picked a topic that needed statistics or scientific explanation. All in all I believe that the articles in the PR News site are more scholarly with a deeper tie to statistics than I had in my writings but we were alike in sentence length and organization of information.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/regular-screening-mammograms-significantly-reduce-breast-cancer-deaths-301997407.html